Wednesday, December 9, 2009
Just a game...a new level of incompetence
Friday, December 4, 2009
Relationships...and other things
Sunday, November 1, 2009
Can I please find a sexual partner who:
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
I hate it when I learn something...
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
My 13 year old just hit 15...
Now I love my mother, and I understand where she is coming from. She loves me and doesn't want to see me do things to myself now that I may regret when I'm older. There is a certain irony in her desires, and perhaps it is because of those ironies that I find myself turning from loving son who never set a foot wrong, and who is fairly anal about abiding by the rules, into a screamin 15 year rebel who fights against his parents and sneaks out of the house - blow your rules! Why? Why do I find it so hard to not simply agree with my mother, nod wisely about her concerns, understand her concerns, and then quietly go and do what I want anyway. After all, it would make her life a lot easier - she'd be less stressed for one thing. Which in turn would make me feel like less of a monster for going against her wishes.
What is boils down to though is that I don't believe she is right. I think she is very, very wrong. Perhaps I am in rebel mode, perhaps all this sex has addled my brain. Perhaps I'm so obssessed with fitting in that I'm doing stupid things just to impress my friends. Sounds like a normal 15 year old kid to me. When I was 15 I was playing Star Trek, domineering my friends, working out how to manipulate people into doing my bidding, and generally being a control freak. Now, I'm still playing Star Trek (some things never change), but now I'm supporting my friends, I'm not judging them on their actions, in fact I'm encouraging them to discover their true nature. Surely this is a better thing?
And so what if this is all based on emotional backwash from sex or from nearly being 30 or from just being fed up with pretending to be an old person? I am not going to justify to you or anyone why I want a tattoo. Or why Iwant to do X and not Y. And I feel that I shouldn't need to do that for my parents either. What I choose to do, or choose not to do is my OWN decision. Right or wrong I need to learn for myself. So that perhaps one day I can tell someone - hey tattoos might seem cool, but wait till your skin falls off. At least though I will have first hand knowledge because I will have done it. This then raises that age old retort - oh so you going to stick your hand in the fire just once? Or jump off a bridge? Or take drugs? The answer to this should be yes and no. No I'm not going to stick my hand in the fire you fucktard because it will fucking burn. This is called a scientific principle. Jump off a bridge? Is it safe? Has an expert in the field said so? If so, then yes, I'll jump. If not, then I might not. Take drugs? Well perhaps. Am I with trusted friends or total coke-head strangers? I will never know what it's like if I don't try. And if I do try, and I do get addicted, well that speaks of a deeper psychological problem which will then be dealt with.
In short I feel we as Humans can be told about certain things that have definates. Speed and you will get a fine. Play with a snake and you will get bitten. But when it comes to 'if', 'what about', and 'because I say so' we tend to loose credibility. We spend enough of our time telling ourselves these stupid projections: If I ask her out, she'll probably slap me because I don't believe in myself. To have others do it for us, I think we are more resistant to them because they may be mirroring the very thoughts inside our own heads. So with this in mind I now have a second maxim to which I shall devote my life:
1 - Speak your mind, those that matter don't mind, those that mind don't matter.
2 - You don't know until you try (unless it's a given).
And the only way it can be a given is if it can be proven with fact and maths. Put a gun to your head and pull the trigger - you will die. Get your ear pierced it may, or may not stretch all the way down to your toes over time.
It's like deciding to have a relationship or not based on whether you think you'll need to break up with the person in the future. It's fucking self defeating. So stop with the lectures, stop with the conjectures, stop with the projectures about what if, maybe, might, possibly, or don't you think. Either give me proof, or shut the fuck up. This then leads me to faith.
Yes I know not the strongest link I've ever written, but it's the second part of what is on my mind at the moment. My possibly-boyfriend-but-we-don't-know-yet-as-we're-still-testing-something is a believer in god (I refuse the capitol letter on point). I am not. I have tried it, and thought genuinly that I was at one stage. But at present I am not. I'm fanatical in my adherance to my belief in not believing. I will argue about it till the cows come home. There is no deity running around making things happen.
But there have been some truly strange things happening recently. I shall list them chronologically for your benefit:
1 - One night I spent in the arms of some lover I discovered his liking of being nibbled. The next morning my flatmate related a dream of his from the previous night wherein he got so frustrated with his partner that he ate him. I thought that was odd.
2 - My present partner was convinced I'd met someone named Peter for lunch. I don't know anyone called Peter. However a few days later I returned home from a business trip early to discover a distant friend and his brother were coming over, a brother named: Peter.
3 - I have been a loyal subscriber to a dating website for the better part of six years. In that time I've met a total of 2 people, 1 of whom I actually met and shagged. Since finding my present squeeze (whom I a very fond of) I have had no less than four out of the blue requests from said dating site from individuals who would not normally talk to me.
Now I know these seem like major points of god-like testing/karma etc. And I'd been inclined to brush them off with that arguement. But what it got me thinking about was why do I so desperately NOT want a god in my life? What is it that I am so reluctant to embrace? My first response to that is: Well that's like wondering why you don't believe in the planet being run by spacemonkey's who control everyone's thoughts via their sperm which they slip into KFC. It's just a stupid, misguided, self serving, population control idea. So no point in believing. But what has led me to this place of such cynical denial? Why am I so 'enlightened' and yet seemingly so many around me are not?
I don't have an answer. I shall go and look for one. Till then, rebel against your elders, they know jack, do something you've always wanted to do, and try figure out why you do or do not need a god in your existance...and then share with us.
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Self Value... Self worth ... Self ish?
Thursday, June 11, 2009
To blog or not to blog...
I started this blog those few months ago - almost a year I guess - with the soul purpose of coming out of the closet once and for all. Since that time I've had people tell me how proud they are of me, how courageous they think I am for doing it, or how much they enjoyed reading it - no matter how disguising and over-shared it might be. And I think what began to happen was a shift from me using the blog as a way of sorting out my inner demons to a way of me using those demons for public applause. How often have I re-written a paragraph so that it was funnier. Is that what my therapist wanted? Re-order your emotional distress so that it is funny? I don't think so. Should I then write dry dull explorations of my inner thoughts? Something so logically layered out that I find a conclusion at the end which is ultimate?
I think not. You see I am a lamenter of self. I lament about many things: My size, my Victorian upbringing, my nose, my eyebrows, my voice, my dick size... just about everything. And I use those as weapons again myself to prevent myself from doing anything. I talk myself into a corner. Then I cover up all those self depreciating statements with 'logical' self created perceived opinions of others. How often have I thought I knew exactly what the other person was going to say - and then discovered that they said the opposite? Countless times. So I have all these defensive arguments that can flit through my head in the matter of seconds, although not at present as I haven't had much sleep recently...) So where that leave me? The self deluding clown?
Which ties up - quiet nicely I think - with Eros, my mysterious date from Tuesday. Don't get your hopes up you are not learning anything about Eros in this blog. And you'll see why later on. But with Eros I often find myself making a little laugh. A chortle. A chuckle. Occasionally a bark. And most often during serious conversations about things. Which unsettles Eros. It would unsettle anyone to have a Madhatter laughing at your serious statement. I was asked by I did it. And my only answer was because I didn't or couldn't think of anything to say. I had no witty retort, not one jot of glib flippancy to offer. And I had no way of answering honestly because I genuinely did not know the answer.
So this laughing thing, this joke thing must therefore be a defensive mechanism. A means of breaking the tension: You'll like me if I make you laugh, and you'll forgive me being stupid, if you're grinning at my jokes. And I suppose that is why my blogs are written with intent to make you chuckle. It's to keep you reading, to keep the sms's coming in. But I realized last night - I don't need to do it. Or if I do, I should do it for my own pleasure. You see I think I have finally got to a place where I now understand the word: Care. Never before in my existence have I understood that word. I love my parents, and my sister, and I care - mildly about their existence. But I'm supposed to do that, and they're supposed to care about me. It's in the contract. But for others? Outside the immediate blood-line? Several blogs down I found a post where I debated whether or not I cared for my friends.
I was being honest about it. I really didn't know if I cared or not. But today or last night I finally felt an emotion that I would call Care. I care irrationally about Eros. And I draw comfort that it is reciprocated. But now that care seems to be expanding, as if I've been given a photograph of my friends in black and white, and it's slowly turning into colour, one by one the people are being coloured in - coloured with care (damn this sounds SO Hallmark). It's a bizarre sensation to worry about someone outside of my own head. I know really want to know how Carmen's baby and house is doing, and Hans and his world, and Mark and his baby, and ... and ... so it goes. These are things that I was mildly interested in before, but now I want to know more, and be there in case they need me. Or even just so that they have someone there.
But all of these are singled around Eros. A key to unlocking something. A key that unlocked something through two simple things:
1 - Extreme honesty
2 - Extreme vulnerability
And that is why I cannot blog about Eros. I can be honest here in my blog. I'm safe. You're reading it from your office/house/phone and can't hit me. You could phone and curse me to hell, but that's about it. But extreme honesty is face to face type stuff. Stuff that scares the shit out of me. I can't really handle it. As for vulnerability well I didn't think in a million years I could be vulnerable with someone. I didn't even know how. I think I'm learning. And when one is vulnerable one is open. And it's that point that I feel we truly find ourselves. All the pretense, the pretext, the subtext, the text, the plot, all fucks off and takes a holiday. Leaving only the real you. It's really scary. I have teeth. I have passion. I have a deep urge to connect to others. But that's lost underneath so many layers.
What I'm really driving at, and I don't know how I drifted down to honesty and vulnerability from my ego trip is that I think I have to rely on talking to others in 'the flesh' to act as my therapy, and not on writing it out and sending it into cyberspace, like a paper boat with a candle in it sent out into a dark pool with a prayer. This is not to say though that I am abandoning you, my beloved reader, because I do like to entertain, and now I really like to entertain, just for your pleasure. So I will be here, writing away furiously for as long as you are happy to read it...
Monday, June 8, 2009
A date...with my 13 year old self
Monday, May 25, 2009
Self Doubt...
I'm irked because I set out to make a 5 minute film, and ended up with eleven. I wrote eight pages, and couldn't drop it to five. In fact it increased to ten. How daft is that? The last competition I entered was for a 20 minute film. Mine ended up nearer to thirty. Here I am purporting to teach others how to write films and yet I myself cannot complete such a simple task as sticking to five pages.
And so I am put out by my own inability. What it raises inside my own mind is capacity. Do I have the capacity to actually produce the goods, or am I simply one of those: 'those that can't do, teach' people? Don't worry dear reader, I'm not. As far as I'm concerned. I cannot be. I rebel at the thought. I refuse to accept it, even if it might be true.
I realize that I am often too eager when it comes to productions. And thankfully I am lucky with this festival. There are two challenges - one in May, and another in June. So I have one last chance to make it right. Or do I? Well what this raises is yet another question: Why do I need a film festival to make films? This is my dream isn't it? This is why I resigned from my old company - so I could make films, my way.
So how is it that in the space of a year (because that's how long it's been) I've only made one short film? Two weeks ago? How did that happen? How has time shot past me so quickly? What happened to making films in December? How about January? All gone past, without so much as a script being written.
I begin to realize dimly that this is what happens to us. We get lost in this quagmire of shit called work. Work designed to allow us to live. But we're not living, we're working. And we're working to ensure we can carry on working. And then when we do do the things we love, we have such high personal expectations we begin to hate them when we fall short. I'm not sure if I'm alone here, but I think I am on to something here.
When was the last time you did something just for yourself, over an extended period of time? What was your last great project? Or are you living the dream? Are you running around doing what you set out to do, and not wanting to do anything else? If you are, then great. I'm envious. But if you are just grinding cogs to make it through the cycles, where or when does it end? Is life all about a few snatched moments of joy amidst weeks or months or years or toil?
My film is all about this question. Because the answer - to my mind - is yes. That is what life is about. We struggle, we hurt, we suffer. And sometimes we laugh. The laugher is all the sweeter because of the other. We define our victory and joy by our suffering and loss. Nothing new here. Man has known this paradox for millenia. So what is new? To me what is new is that I now realize that those moments must be savoured, and not missed. In otherwords my dear reader:
"We all make sacrifices, we all do; we just need to make sure we're making the right ones."
Those of us who don't sacrifice something of ourselves, who don't prostitute our abilities to others in exchange for a few moments of joy - are themselves without joy. How can you be happy, if everything you've ever wanted has been handed to you. Define the joy of struggling to achive soemthing, if you can just buy it. There is no value without struggle.
This is something nature offers us, by way of survival of the fittest. Only the stripy zebra's escape. The boring ones - the plain ones - get eaten. What is my point? Do I have one? Do you have one? We all have dreams and goals, hopes and desires. Yet most of us seem to forget them in exchange for basic existance. But basic existance is meaningless without oppsites. Suffering without respite, isn't suffering any more. It's just existance. Joy without loss isn't joy, it's just existance.
So the next time you suffer a setback, or a joy, savour it. Relish it and look at how you can turn it around so that you can then use it to define your next moment. Someone once said: A man is defined by his actions. I agree. We are defined by ours, in particular our actions towards attaining joy, regardless of the vexing suffering that we must pass through first. Embrace the suffering, it'll lead to greater joy later.
So here is this weeks challenge: Think about a 'personal' goal. Bend your will towards getting it, no matter the cost. This challenge is only valid for something that you will need to struggle to get. Now, go fight for it...
Monday, May 4, 2009
Sex... at last... shit.
Saturday, March 28, 2009
To play or not...
Today I got a taste of the future of gaming, and by god does it taste like shit with a capitol SH…IT. I have two games that I want to play. One is online, and the other is or rather said on the box – requires internet to install. Now working in the film industry I know all about copy right and so forth and so on, and I understand that in a bid to ensure that their games are not copied and distributed computer software giants are resorting to online security checks. Fine. I support that. I’m a proud member of STEAM, PUNK BUSTER, XFIRE, SEGA, ACTIVISION, LIONHEAD, the list continues.
Today it has taken me nearly an hour to launch the one game. Steam likes to update itself, check to see if Mother Theresa has risen from the dead, download a few porn (Heterosexual no doubt), scratch it’s digital balls and then decide to update the game. I remember when it used to take 30 minutes to load a game. It was called the COMMODORE 64, and the game was on cassette tape. Oh and that was nearly 20 years ago. We’re going backwards? Or is South Africa not keeping up? Well certainly on the net side of things I know SA is behind. But hopefully in 2010 that will change.
So then lets look at the other game, the one that has taken 5 gigs of downloads, two weeks of updates and two reinstalls. Lord of the Rings Online. Now I don’t mind paying R150 a month for a game like this. It updates regularly, I can play with my mates and all is good and well. Or so you’d think? They recently changed their billing company who are now separate. OK, well I haven’t played the game for a while now, but sure – I’ll give yet another company my digital DNA (name, addy, credit card etc). Except that before I’d even seen a hobbit’s hair foot, the website cheerfully tells me to phone the UK because my card and account has been blocked.
No reason, just blocked. Phone the UK. Guess what – the number doesn’t work! Hahahahahaha. OK, so I look for my land line telephone (it’s usually lying next to the ADSL router which is permanently connected. Can’t find the phone. Turn the house inside out, upside down. No phone. Either my flatmates have shoved it up their asses in some bizarre sexual version of broken telephone, or the maid has tossed it out, or simply put it in the cupboard with the dishwashing liquid… brb –
-no, not there either.
So I can’t use Telkom to call the UK. Now the reason why I’m trying to call them is because three weeks ago this happened. And so I sent them an email – as they suggest. Fuck all. Not even an automated response. Nothing. So I wrote to Codemasters (makers of Lord of the Rings Online) and complained. How was I supposed to give them my R150 per month if I couldn’t even resolve why I wasn’t allowed to sign up? Their response was swift.
“Regretfully we are not licensed to operate in South Africa and so cannot provide support.”
Regretfully I bought their FUCKING GAME in a South African store. To me that means, if you ship if to a country and take people’s money, you license yourself to provide support. But anyway… so today I tried another credit card, after going through the shlep of creating a new free email address (won’t allow my username to even enter a different card… just blocked), go through the whole D DNA thing again, and what happens? Guess? You got it – FUCKING BLOCKED – AGAIN! A different card! I give up. I bought a game and I can’t play it. And the people who sold it to me – won’t help me. And the people who made it – deny it’s their problem. Where does that leave me?
Wait – it gets better – it leaves me trying to write my blog about how frustrated I am. EXCEPT THE BLOG THING IS FUCKED!!!!! And yes I’m using multiple exclamation points because it’s necessary. The blogger I use loads up to the sign in page, and then sits there. So I’m writing this in word pad (a good, tried and tested fucking program that doesn’t need fucking internet or STEAM or anything to work). I will, when the blog site is back and running, try to upload this. If not, I’ll go cut my fingers off for something to do and be mildly entertained by.
Good bye cruel digital world… like you give a fuck.
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
I was having dinner with two friends the other day. Two friends who are at opposite ends of their lives in terms of change. The one friend has a stable job, owns a house, has a car, and knows what he wants from planet Earth. The other just got his girlfriend pregnant, lives with the in laws to be, and has a part time job. In six months time that little critter is gonna pop out of the mother and turn his world upside down. His social life is about to change forever. I have another group of friends who - although they have planned for their spawn - will also change their lives forever. And then there is me, who was supposed to go on a blind date the other day (it was canceled by him and moved to this weekend). I've never, ever, ever been in a relationship that I've taken seriously with intent. So my world is going to change as well. I've noticed that no matter how much one says: Oh, it'll still be the same, nah we'll both join you - you'll see. And I've seen. Couples - no matter how wonderful they are, and I know a few - are just that - couples.
Their psyche has changed, and their loyalty as well. It makes social engagements a little trickier, as now you have TWO peoples calenders to align. For as much as couples like to do things on their own, they're more inclined to do things as a couple. In short what I'm driving at is that once someone becomes part of a couple restraints appear (intentionally and unintentionally). Now that causes change. Big change, in many small ways. The couples with kids - well, their offspring become the most important part of their world, and rightly so. Everything else is merely a wonderful distraction. As for those in relationships doing things alone seems empty without the other.
What's your point I hear you groan? Well my point is - this dinner conversation I was having with these friends. The bloke who's life is as stable a rock was concerned over a statement of mine:
"Friends change and move apart. That's life. We go with the flow to be happy, and that flow invariably shifts. Why should we try to keep old friendships alive, just for the sake of friendship?"
What I mean to say is that I don't feel that one should need to 'work' at friendships. I've heard countless people say: oh you have to work at them (friendships and relationships). My question is why? Why should I put in any work to something that is supposed to be there ostensibly for enjoyment? I mean we have friends because initially they entertain us. Then we move into the close friendship role, where one then starts discussing idea's, dream's, hopes etc. Finally our really 'close' friends we use as sounding boards for our life's big changes. We seek advice from one another. If you ask me it sounds like we look for people whom we can then use to help us with our OWN lives. I know people will say there is more to it. But is there really? If a friend of mine says he's struggling financially. I'd offer him what little money I had, and I'd offer a room in my house. But once the phone call was over, I'd think - poor so and so. And that would be it. I'd move on to my own problems.
So when a friendship naturally starts to drift...I say bon voyage. When my friends all have kids and they have their little kid's parties and fears and phobia's, they'll develop their own friendships with other couples with kids. And they can all share in the delights of their kids. I don't like kids. I don't find their actions funny, interesting, or remotely entertaining. If I did like kids maybe it would be a different post. But sadly I don't. I don't relate to them. But should I expect my married friends to be interested in my world? Sure - they're still humans. Do I expect them to interact in my world? No. Maybe once or twice a year, when the kids are at grandma's. Because I sure as hell don't want kids in my house. But I also expect them to assume that I'm interested in their kids. Read above - I'm not. Why should I be? Just because they're my friends kids? Who cares? They do, naturally. I don't. So when we go out to dinner, and the kids are there making a noise, or being kids, or being perfect I'll have to adapt. I can't refer to that mother fucker bitch lesbian who lives down the road. I can't extol the virtues of decapitating a son-of-a-bitch and bleeding him like a pig. I'll need to be restrained. For the sake of the kids? At least I would be, regardless of parental decision.
But what about the friends who don't change? What about them? My mother hates change. She derives her sense of self worth by how much things haven't changed. I have friends who don't seem to change. Always constant. One of them changed his job the other day, in a massive leap of faith he quit his existing job and found another. Damn was I impressed. For years he hadn't changed. Then suddenly. My point is - people change. It is a requirement of existence on this planet. Those who actively seek to go against change, usually end up with lots of cats in a house alone. I don't know why. I on the other hand embrace change. I openly flaunt change, seeking to develop new idea's, myself, and my existence, and I write these blogs to hopefully inspire change in others.
So when I look at friendships, as one friend pointed out - I've never had to look for friends. They've always found me. In heaps. I have lots of friends. But when I look at those friendships, I am incapable of feeling sorrow when they end. And I don't feel any justification for keeping a friendship running when the two friends have nothing left, except history. Sticking together because of history is to me a sad and miserable existence. It means you're friends because of what happened in the past, not because of what's happening now. That is an incredible view point. If I'm not having fun now, what is the point? Hoping or trying to force fun to happen in the future? Because it happened once before in the past? I'm sorry but that's just silly.
So this blog then is a question to all of you out there - what is friendship, and what does it actually mean to you, and why do you cherish it? Why do you mourn it's loss or 'fight' to save it? Because I don't know those answers. To summarize:
Friendship to me is mutual entertainment. I make you feel good, and so do you. I push you to change, and so do you. It means to me the ability to be entertained by you, and for me to feel good that I've entertained you. I cherish it because I like to be entertained, and I like to entertain. I don't mourn it's loss because there are 6.5 billion people on Earth and I'll find someone else to entertain, and be entertained by. What we had was great, but that doesn't mean it will never happen again with other people. And I don't fight to save things. If they end, they end. I accept it, and move on. Because if I don't - well nothing will stop, care, or well... everything will still happen. It's the same attitude I have to death. My grandmother died. I was... put out. I wanted more information from her, I wanted to spend more time with her to learn her stories, and hear her insights. But that was over. So I said good bye at her funeral and that's it. I didn't mourn. It was just over. Move on.
A friend said I'm a stark realist. I like to think so. I spend enough time deluding myself and pretending not to care about money, my health, and my own talent that I don't have time to then fight or hold on to the past. It's over, and here's the key - it has no, zero, less than nought, bearing on the Now. A friend lost is gone. They cannot help you now. Thus I ask: What is friendship to you, and why is it so important?
Monday, March 16, 2009
The orgasming whistling duck of Withelingweath...
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Friends and enemies...
Recently and not so recently this simple little game of make-believe and group story telling has nearly ripped my friendships apart because one of the fundamental concepts of the game is: The rules are always right, unless the Game Master (GM) decides otherwise (in effect - use the rules till you don't want them/need them etc). The other fundamental is the Game Master is always right. It's his world after all. But something that has always been a major issue in my life as a Game Master is a balance between GM rules, and Book rules. I hate book rules. I really and truly do. I find them so restrictive in terms of narration. It limits the players in what their characters can do, it limits the GM in terms of what he can do. On the other end of the scale though is a game without rules is simply chaos. And different players see actions and requirements differently.
So of late we've been bumping heads - my players and I. Those who love the rules (Rules Lawyers) and those who hate the rules (Rules Anarchists) have been at logger heads. Then compound this with the fact that players misread the rules (both intentionally and unintentionally), apply those rules haphazardly, or in some cases ignore the rules this can cause some major issues. Finally add in a GM aka me who simply uses the rules as pretty pictures and makes up his own anyway. What you get is a potential clash of wills. The Rules Lawyers fight amongst themselves (its amusing to see the squabbles over whether a dwarf can jump a ten foot chasm without being tossed), the Rules Anarchists ignore everyone anyway, and the GM is simply keeping the monsters coming until someone dies.
Not a pretty picture. All those intellectual virtues, those communications skills... collapse into a heap as the kids fight over a +2 or +4 bonus. Finally when you add to the mix vast quantities of caffeine, pizza, salt, sugar, and lack of sleep those tempers shift from being within the game, to without the game. And friendships start to crack. It's the funniest thing. And for a while I couldn't work out why we would prefer a game over a human. Why we blame bad players, and not bad rules. Curious is it not? The conclusion I came to the other day whilst screaming a dear friend of mine over the phone about whether or not a jump forward and down would incur more damage than a simple jump down (who cares?) is that this is the ultimate form of escapism for those of us with the capacity to imagine.
For the game involves/ed using paper, pencils, dice, and occasionally a map. Nothing tangible. The new version of the game now involves little miniatures, but the majority of the play is on paper and in your head. There is the nub of it. In your head. It's a personal experience that you're sharing with others. No wonder we get fidgety over a +2... it's a personal +2. +2 inches could be a whole big difference in the real world, and its more so in the fantasy world. And then I realized as well that there are not only the Rules Lawyers and the Rules Anarchists - but there are also the serious players and the non-serious players. And within those two categories there are two camps. The Serious players are dedicated to the rules first and foremost. The rules, the numbers, the values, are all that matter. Application of those values will in some way give them immense pleasure. The second camp within the serious players are those who play their character for life. They are desperate their this extension of themselves to succeed. And will not vary until they have. Naturally you get people who do both - rules and character obsession.
The other camp - the non-serious guys, play the game because it's interesting to see how the story will unfold for the particular character they're playing. They might be rules lawyers in which case they want to see how far they can push the rules, and how much fun they can have with those rules. Or like myself the non-serious player is there to have fun. He uses the rules in the opposite direction of the fanatical achiever to create characters with flaws, with weak values just to see what happens. And when his character dies, he simply pulls out the next one. For example last night we played, and I rolled (created) two options - a near sighted dwarf or a paranoid elf. I just wanted to see if these could become heroes. The paranoid elf, although afraid of everything trying to kill him, so far, has managed to avoid death.
But what amazes me, and is the actual crux of this post is that whether you're serious or not, a lawyer or not the result is the same: Frustrations in the game spill over into the real world. A slight of honour in the games applications slap the real players. Again as Humans we have managed to create a set of rules that have as much meaning as fairy dust, and those self created rules rip us apart. I'm sure that each of us could go off and write our own rules (hell I've done that three times already in 10 years). Start our own games where we call all play the role of GM.. of god. So is this what we'd call a closed system experiment? A small simple system describing a larger system? The rise of religion? Perhaps I'm stretching the analogy too far, but all I know is that it's really not worth destroying real friendships because of some self created rules...
But then again... why do we do it? Imagination is a powerful thing, perhaps the only thing that separates us from the other animals. After all imagination is what we need in order to develop our skills with manipulating the intangible. So is an attack on our imagination, an affront on our creative mind, then the greatest attack that one can make against man? Attack the only thing that makes us Human? Now there is something to think about...